How not to boycott




Ineffective Campaign

Originally uploaded by Eric Kilby

So you may have heard of this guy Barry. Barry plays baseball for a living. Barry is really, really good at his job, and has been for a long time. At a certain point, Barry noticed most people his age weren’t doing so well, so he tried this and that to keep his job. Some of this was good old fashioned exercise. Some of that was kinda-sorta-not-so-legal-even-less-ethical-but-not-illegal (in an unofficial, nobody’s-telling way, of course). We don’t know exactly what happened, but alot of people made up their mind regardless.

Many of these people were at the Red Sox vs. Giants game Friday night. They were easy to spot, they chanted “ster-oids” whenever Barry showed up at the plate, maple in hand. These people also stood on their feet to watch a hall-of-famer bat for the first time in Fenway Park.

Advice: If you want to boycott someone, you don’t spend 30, 50, 100+ dollars to buy a ticket to a game, and you don’t stand up on tiptoes to see every pitch thrown to him.

Rational Exuberance

I’m a fairweather football fan, and the last 5+ years have been good ones for New England area fans, fairweather or die-hard. I watched the two games yesterday, Seahawks @ Bears and Patriots @ Chargers, and was immediately reminded why I just can’t get into the sport in any serious manner.

For those that don’t know, last weekend was the second round of the NFL’s 4-round playoff season. One of the reasons I think football is so popular is that it’s so easy to follow. There’s no grueling 162-game marathon, very few weeknight games, and a season ticket is only 8 regular-season games. I watched 50% of the entire league’s playoff games for this round in the space of a few hours, something that would require taking a sabbatical for a sport like basketball. Add a TiVo to the mix to skip past all the downtime and you’ve got some good action. Seeing guys get tossed like ragdolls and exciting plays like interceptions, as well as freaks of nature like Shaun Alexander, who makes the rest of the field look like it’s in slow-motion, is good entertainment. Yes, entertainment.

So first up was the Seattle Seahawks playing the favored Chicago Bears. They battle it out for a while, the Bears benefiting from Seattle’s quarterback Hasselbeck making a few big mistakes, and the game is tied going into overtime. I really didn’t care who won, I don’t follow either team and it’s two of my favorite cities, but it was an immediate letdown. Why? Because overtime in football is probably the thirdmost anti-climactic thing in professional sports. (The second is also in football, where they run down the clock, and the first is pretty much anything that happens in soccer).

Football is a game modeled on the same principles as warfare of the 18th century. Everyone lines up, everyone has a job, and you go at it. The two sides are rarely evenly matched, but there’s the sense that if everyone does their job and the plan is sound, you have a chance. Overtime takes that and flips it on its head, because it’s sudden death. Whoever scores first, wins. The really disappointing part is that it usually ends on a field goal, and the team that gets the ball first is decided by a coin toss. The Seahawks won the toss, but didn’t score. The Bears moved the ball a bit, and kicked the winning field goal.

Football is no stranger to rule changes, so I’d like to see two more. First, both teams are guaranteed at least one possession. If there’s a turnover, at least the other team had a chance. Second, and much more importantly, no field goals. Sorry kickers, I’d rather see the whole team have to win, not just you.

After that game, the Patriots played the favored Chargers. Both teams played a sloppy, but enjoyable game. The Patriots came back in the 4th quarter to tie it, and took the lead on a field goal. The Chargers got the ball, made a field goal attempt, and missed it, game over. The big story of the game, however, is that the Patriots overcelebrated their victory, “showing up” the Chargers on their own turf. So now the darlings of the NFL media, the reigning dynasty in the league, were made to look like a bunch of hooligans with “no respect for the game”.

There seemed to be two major offenses. The first was that they were jumping on the Chargers logo in midfield. The solution to this is a simple one. If you or your fans are too sensitive about your corporate logo being tarnished, don’t paint it on the field. The second was that the Patriots appropriated the taunting dance of the Charger’s defensive superstar Shawne Merriman. Never mind that Merriman did it after every sack, or that Merriman had shown his personal respect for the game by failing a drug test. The league MVP Tomlinson was so incensed he charged at the group and had to be restrained, and kept his anger boiling through the post-game press conference.

To borrow Rob Corddry’s attempted catch-phrase, “coooome ooon!” Sports are first and foremost entertainment. Fans pay hundreds of dollars to watch guys play a game most of us gave up in adolescence, after which they retire to their mansions and spend the rest of the life getting updates on the charitable tax deductions their assistants run for them. I’d argue they deserve the money they get, not because they are psuedo-heroes or guardians of contrived traditions, but as entertainers. I want to see the winners be happy and the losers be sad. I want to see grown men doing silly dances because they carried a warped ball over a line of paint. The next day, I want to read about the ridiculous comments from a guy who had to cheat to get a 700 on his SAT.

If the Yankees beat the Red Sox and a pinstriped marching band ran out onto the Fenway infield and Derek Jeter stuck the game winning ball in his pants while A-Rod did the funky chicken on homeplate, I’d be laughing out loud. When they silently tap gloves and retreat to the locker room, I feel deprived not only of my team’s victory, but the sense that it actually meant something to the team who took it from them.

So let’s forget about respecting the hallowed traditions of a child’s game played by rich men of often questionable character, managed by billionaires who hold lifetime fans hostage and demand taxes to pay for expensive stadiums with horrible parking. I just want to see people show up, play as hard as possible, and put on a good show. If you win or lose, show me that you’re playing this game for something more than the huge paychecks, and that you’re as excited or disappointed as the crazy fat guys that painted themselves blue to try and give you an edge in the contest.

Baseball HOF 2007

This years Baseball Hall of Fame election results have been announced. Here’s what would have been my votes. Those who were elected are in bold.

Harold Baines – No
Albert Belle – Almost
Dante Bichette – No
Bert Blyleven – Almost
Bobby Bonilla – No
Scott Brosius – No
Jay Buhner – No
Ken Caminiti – No
Jose Canseco – Almost
Dave Concepcion – No
Eric Davis – No
Andre Dawson – No
Tony Fernandez – No
Steve Garvey – Almost
Rich Gossage – Almost
Tony Gwynn – Yes
Orel Hershiser – No
Tommy John – No
Wally Joyner – No
Don Mattingly – No
Mark McGwire – Yes
Jack Morris – No
Dale Murphy – No
Paul O’Neill – No
Dave Parker – No
Jim Rice – Yes
Cal Ripken Jr.- Yes
Bret Saberhagen – No
Lee Smith – Almost
Alan Trammell – No
Devon White – No
Bobby Witt – No

Notes:

HOF votes should not be secret. Why? Because we need to see who didn’t vote for players like Gwynn and Ripken and fire them. The supposed logic here is that since nobody was ever elected unanimously, nobody ever should be, but that’s bunk. The point of the HOF is so we can take our kids there someday and show them the revolutionary players like Ripken (which outweighs the fairly inconsequential Streak), and players like Gwynn who make something so hard look so easy. If you want to impose your own twisted house rules, go vote somewhere else.

I’m not really surprised that McGwire didn’t get in, but I am surprised how few votes he got (23.5%). The topic of steroids in baseball is annoying, and the consequences are inconsistent. Steroids have been around for over 50 years, and clearly players have used them in all sports. To say that McGwire is the one of the first to abuse them is simply false, especially when people hold up the hitters of the 60s and 70s as examples of people who didn’t. We have no idea if Hank Aaron or Jim Rice or Tom Seaver used drugs or supplements, and even to suggest the possibility as I’m doing here is blasphemy. Despite longstanding media hype to the contrary, there isn’t even any credible evidence that steroids have adverse effects on grown men. McGwire is 6’5″, Canseco is 6’4″, both are well over 200lbs and took advantage of modern nutrition and training. Mantle was 5’11”, Aaron is 6′, and both were relatively lean. They also grew up in an era where people didn’t even know what effects basic vitamins really had. To say that modern sluggers were “obviously” using steroids and other hormone supplements is silly, and even if they were, can someone prove that they shouldn’t? We’ve proven the dangers of weight training as well as alcohol and red meat and sodium and pretty much everything else athletes put into their bodies, why aren’t they banned as well?

Jim Rice isn’t a legend like Ruth or Cobb, but he was a dominant force for a long time. There are many opinions why he can’t seem to get enough votes, from his mediocre fielding to his frosty relationship with the press and fans, but he should be in.

Albert Belle got 3.5% of the votes, not even enough to stay on the ballot. He was a troubled personality whose career ended on a very sour note, but the voters apparently forgot that he was a terrifying hitter who competed for MVP status, had 9 consecutive seasons of 100 RBIs, and a career .295 average. Perhaps not HOF numbers, but clearly a brighter talent than some who finished ahead of him.