http://efsavage.com/blog/posts/code-coverage-by-checked-exceptions/ Good stuff, updated weekly(ish) Wed, 09 May 2012 12:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://efsavage.com/blog/posts/code-coverage-by-checked-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-26032 Eric Savage Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:06:05 +0000 http://www.efsavage.com/blog/?p=307#comment-26032 I tried to cover that in the second paragraph, but I definitely think that "[unit] testing for accuracy" makes the point much more clearly. I tried to cover that in the second paragraph, but I definitely think that “[unit] testing for accuracy” makes the point much more clearly.

]]> http://efsavage.com/blog/posts/code-coverage-by-checked-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-25987 Romulus Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:17:38 +0000 http://www.efsavage.com/blog/?p=307#comment-25987 Unit tests should be doing much more than testing for exceptions. They should be testing for accuracy as well. Presumably if I feed 2 and 3 into your add() method, and it returns 6, it won't throw an exception. Unit tests are less a way to say "you wrote robust code" and more a way to say "you wrote correct code". Unit tests should be doing much more than testing for exceptions. They should be testing for accuracy as well. Presumably if I feed 2 and 3 into your add() method, and it returns 6, it won’t throw an exception. Unit tests are less a way to say “you wrote robust code” and more a way to say “you wrote correct code”.

]]>